Permanent hair removal in a clinic costs A$300 to A$450 per session on average, and you need six to eight of them. At-home IPL devices promise the same result for the price of a single session — but between the A$130 models and the A$820 ones, which ones actually deliver?
Our team investigated: 21 models bought anonymously, without contacting a single brand, and 50 female volunteers (aged 22-54, skin types I to V) recruited for 16 weeks of testing — one session a week, on a control area, with standardised photos and blind measurements.
📋 Our full methodology: anonymous purchase, panel of 50 testers, 16-week protocol (click to expand)
OUR METHODOLOGY — FULL TRANSPARENCY
- Selection: 21 models chosen from the best-selling IPL hair removal devices on Amazon AU, Chemist Warehouse, Priceline, Myer, brand websites and online pharmacies (January 2026).
- Purchase: 100% of the devices were bought anonymously on our own personal cards. No product was supplied by a brand.
- Panel: 50 unpaid female volunteers, aged 22-54, skin types I to V (all tones except very dark), light to dark brown body hair, recruited outside our immediate circle.
- Golden rule: each tester was assigned one single device for the entire duration of the test, to rule out any cross-contamination of results. The 50 testers were split into subgroups of 2 to 10 depending on the model (the 5 finalists were each tested by 10 testers; the 16 eliminated models by 2 to 5).
- Protocol: 16 weeks, 1 session per week, on the right calf (a consistent control area). Photos under standardised lighting every 2 weeks.
- Measurement: hair density assessed by dermascope (Visiopore PT3) before and after the protocol, blind (the operator did not know which device had been used).
- Scoring: final mark out of 10, calculated as a weighted average of 5 criteria (see the scoring grid below).
The scoring grid: 5 criteria, 100 points
Final mark out of 10, a weighted average of five criteria defined with an independent dermatologist:
effectiveness
& safety
for money
& support
& design
The verdict at a glance
Here is our final ranking of the 5 highest-scoring models out of the 21 we tested.
Why the Loop scored highest
Honestly, the team wasn't expecting this result. When the Loop arrived at the lab, its understated packaging and relatively low price (A$294.95 against A$639.95 for the Braun) raised a few eyebrows. Several team members actually expected it to finish near the bottom of the ranking.
Then the weekly photos from the ten testers assigned to this model started coming in. By week three, regrowth had fallen by more than 60% on average (dermascope measurement). By the eighth session, skin was close to smooth for most of the sub-panel. By the twelfth, only a few fine downy hairs were left.
What makes the difference, according to the measurements taken with our dermatologist? An energy density that is more than sufficient, a light filter that blocks harmful UV, and above all a precision head compact enough for sensitive areas without constantly swapping attachments.
The Loop is designed by a European brand, with a notably responsive customer service team: average reply time under 2 hours during the test.
✓ Strengths
- Measurable results from week 3
- 3 to 4 sessions are enough for underarms
- 5 adjustable intensity levels
- Works on face, bikini line, legs and underarms
- Suitable for all skin types I-V
- Responsive customer service based in Europe
- 100-day money-back guarantee
- Free delivery
- Stated lifespan: ~12 years (500,000 flashes)
✕ Weaknesses
- Frequently out of stock
- Only available on the official website
- Counterfeits are common on Amazon/eBay
- Not recommended for skin type VI
The Silk·Expert Pro 5 is an excellent device — credit where it's due. Braun has been working with IPL technology for years, and it shows in the build quality. The built-in precision head means you never have to swap attachments, and the device can run plugged in continuously, which is welcome on longer sessions.
On raw effectiveness, the results measured by our dermascope are very close to the Loop's. The difference lies elsewhere: at A$639.95, the Braun costs more than twice the Loop for similar performance. Several testers in the sub-panel also reported mild irritation on sensitive areas (bikini line, underarms).
✓ Strengths
- 3 intensity levels, SkinPro sensor
- Reliable heritage brand
- Precision head included
- Skin Health Alliance approved
- Clear results after 4 weeks
✕ Weaknesses
- High price (A$639.95)
- Irritation reported on bikini line/underarms
- Less ergonomic than the Loop
- Warranty limited to 2 years
The Lumea Prestige is probably the best-known model on the market, and it does the job. SenseIQ technology automatically adapts the intensity to your skin tone, which is reassuring for beginners. But at A$714.95, it is noticeably more expensive than the Loop for a slower result (6 weeks versus 3 in our testing).
Another point the team picked up on: Philips advertises “92% less hair in 3 sessions”, but that result only appeared from the 6th session onwards under our protocol. A gap between the marketing and the measured reality.
✓ Strengths
- Suitable for all skin types I-V
- Smart SenseIQ sensor
- 4 precision attachments
- Extremely well-known brand
✕ Weaknesses
- Very high price (A$714.95)
- Slower results than advertised
- Maximum power insufficient for coarse hair
- Unintuitive mobile app
Silk'n had its moment in the sun, but the technology has barely moved on in 5 years. First results take their time (8 sessions minimum in our test) and several testers reported reliability issues after a few months of use. At A$379.95 it isn't a bad choice, but for A$85 less the Loop does a considerably better job.
✓ Strengths
- Easy to get to grips with
- Works on the whole body
- Widely available in store
✕ Weaknesses
- Dated technology
- Declining quality according to user reviews
- Slow results (8+ sessions)
- Mixed reviews online
The cheapest of the selection, and... it shows. The Beurer IPL Pure does the bare minimum. Compact, portable, simple, but with limited power that means 10 sessions or more for middling results. Several cases of skin irritation were reported by our panel. One for tight budgets that simply want to try the technology out.
✓ Strengths
- The cheapest in the comparison
- Compact and portable
- 3 intensity levels
- 600,000 flashes stated
✕ Weaknesses
- Average build quality
- Not dermatologically certified
- Irritation reported
- Slow results (10+ weeks)
Your questions about IPL hair removal devices
Our final verdict
Out of the 21 IPL hair removal devices tested over these 4 months, the 5 models in this ranking all stand out for their effectiveness and their quality, to different degrees and at different prices.
Whether you're after raw performance, a heritage brand, an all-rounder or a first device to try the technology, each of the 5 finalists has its place. The choice comes down above all to your budget, your skin type and the area you want to treat.
